Not again..!
Its an issue with Qwest who burst uses his or her upstream. I'm Qwest sux and also you should not really blame burst. However, its their very own fault because of not being multihomed and depending on a single place.

Simply by 2 cents....
These men are large right and also have loads clients yet they're more hard to rely on than most small hosts why people choose large money getting hosts who couldnt give two hoots really about your internet site is amzing

I must accept yourself on that
You realize, I truly don't care if it's Burst or QWest. My website was lower, which is. I can not stand this!

Just great!!
They are lower again!!
Not only burst.net is lower, but all servers are VDI are lower too.

Yep - VDI, site5, burst...all lower. They're certainly getting some type of problem.
Once the line into VDI goes lower (additionally they pointed out router problems?), the entire NOC goes lower. Including all the hosts you pointed out who're situated at VDI. Sure you realize this already, but...
Chicken - yep. Just an observation for Joe - although I believe that whenever a lot of good and the bad he's reaching the stage where it does not matter whether it's the host or even the provider. He appears to become getting pretty p.o.'ed.
I've a merchant account with burst too, and I am nearly at that time. Despite the fact that you browse the posts, and thoroughly choose, everything doesn't always go the right path. Plan B.
We can not blame Burst,site5 and then any other host co locate at VDI. But we must blame VDI because of not controlling their network correctly. I'm wondering why wouldn't they include another line being that they are already generating a lot money.


Initially published by Chicken:
I've a merchant account with burst too, and I am nearly at that time. Despite the fact that you browse the posts, and thoroughly choose, everything doesn't always go the right path. Plan B.
Much better than Plan 9 from Space, I really hope. Regardless, it appears as if they're back...

  • 1