First, something for anybod that connects to the web via DSL or perhaps a cable modem. You ought to have a firewall in your pc. Fortunately, a great one, Zone Alarm, is free of charge and ewsy to set up. You'll find it at http://zonealarm.com/ you may also read why you need to get one.

Another site that everyone that utilizes a Home windows based PC should take a look at, is Gibson Research Corp. at http://grc.com/ Several security issues are covered and you will have your computer examined to show many weaknesses (and why you'll need a firewall).

You may also find out how information is being sent out of your computer when you download a course with Netscape or America online, amongst others, along with other data.

Remember, it isn't paranoia if they are really watching. They're, and they are not going to let you know. Like selecting a great host, it's as much as us to teach ourselves.

It is not only frightening to determine what info has been collected, but shameful. Our privacy has been penetrated without our understanding or consent.

Spread the term.
Uh, who exactly besides random scanning devices would you suppose are attempting to monitor your connection or looking for a wide open port in your system? I am all for private fire walls (and would recommend BlackICE Defender in addition to ZoneAlarm, each of which we've placed on our network here), however i think FUD about possible monitoring of traffic in your connection is uncalled for.

If you are worried about what various programs you download are delivering to the mothership, ZoneAlarm is very proficient at obstructing programs except individuals you specify, and also the Cleaner (http://www.moosoft.com, free eval for thirty days) will examine the body for possible trojan viruses and clean them out of your system.

------------------
Annette
Hosting Matters, Corporation.
http://www.hostmatters.com
Yep, I have see clearly. And yep, many people have some kind of spy ware on their own system (while not some of ours around the home network, once we have them clean). And yep, it's intrusive and annoying. I love OptOut for things that it may do, and that i always suggest that people get ZoneAlarm, if perhaps since it watches outgoing traffic too, and can block suspicious traffic, for example spy ware, trojan viruses, etc. (BlackICE watches it, but does not warn you about this - it's better at inbound). However I think there's more danger for individuals installing trojan viruses onto their systems that will deliver outgoing payloads, or virus-tanks they activate, either deliberately or otherwise. Getting certain demographic data delivered back towards the mothership pales compared to losing data in your system, entirely or simply.

------------------
Annette
Hosting Matters, Corporation.
http://www.hostmatters.com
Browse the information on the website and discover for yourself. Odds are high that that many Home windows customers attached to the Internet have spy ware on their own computer systems. See Opt Out at grc.com
I sure am glad I personally use linux on my small primary desktop. No infections or spy ware.
Before you begin to obtain panicky, just install packet blocking in your DSL/Cable modem.

This does not just affect MS Os's, it affects all.

Surely this really is apparent? You would not place your network around the net without needing some kind of packet blocking? Thinking about also use it an always on link with your computer?
Packet blocking is essential.

For me personally, it isn't a significant concern when i can't get DSL or Cable(even TV).

Yes, some things are worse than the others. However, the thing is for individuals to become more alert on the thought of security overall, and the things they can perform aboput it (a lot of it free of charge). Some makes use of are merely invasive while some are calamitous. It seems sensible to prevent these when you are aware.
Elsewhere, I just read an argument from someone who boiled lower to: if, given everything which have been happening in the last handful of several weeks, individuals are not implementing steps to safeguard their systems, they get the things they deserve. I disagree with this, obviously. Lots of people might be more aware now from the security issues they face by getting an always-on connection (or perhaps a dialup connection, for things like Aureate). The secret is keeping them give consideration and making the effects of the failure to safeguard their systems something they are able to understand without technical jargon or finish-of-the-world, panicky type pronouncements.

------------------
Annette
Hosting Matters, Corporation.
http://www.hostmatters.com
To be sure, and there is nothing with what I stated which was "end-of-the-world, panicky type pronouncements." All of us saw that this past year and earlier using the Y2K non-event when a myriad of absurd forecasts were produced by individuals who didn't have understanding whatsoever from the problem. I had been so disgusted which i known as a couple of local radio and television stations and hang them straight, leaving comments ont he low quality of the confirming because it was clearly so naive.

Observe that because the year started, there has been no bulletins of major occasions due to y2k.

I wasn't mentioning particularly for your publish regarding the hype that individuals often give things. It had been just a general discuss the media circus-like, seem bite amount of time in which we live.

Have you ever read some of Gary North's documents about Y2K? Discuss dire effects - with no you have heard greatly from him since Y2K grew to become a non-event...

------------------
Annette
Hosting Matters, Corporation.
http://www.hostmatters.com

[This message continues to be edited by Annette (edited 07-17-2000).]
Annette,

I wasn't sure should you be implying it or otherwise (though I leaned towards not), hence my equally ambiguous reply (on that time). :-)

I do not recall Gary North's documents, and that i obtain the impression he would be a y2k disaster and gloomer. These happen to be very quiet now they have proven fools.

The thing is exactly the same principle (making claims about something one does not understand) again and again in lots of things, especially computer systems.

I love to know how things work. It will help understanding what can be done and what is not, even if apparently trustworthy people spout it. Obviously, I do not consider most news people trustworthy. They'd rather spread what's popular than what's true. The y2k non event and the start of the following millenium (next The month of january 1) are great good examples. The very first is technical, but the second reason is simple arithmetic, plus they still misreported it.
Heck no - we are usually on a single wavelength on things.

Gary North was among the loudest voices about all of the garbage that would happen consequently from the clock rollover (as well as incorporated things completely unrelated to Y2K - a good example: one bank not cashing a cheque attracted on another bank, that they known as impending disaster for whatever reason).

Ah well think about it. The amount of individuals who speak without thinking and with no make an effort to gain understanding will invariably outnumber individuals that do not.

------------------
Annette
Hosting Matters, Corporation.
http://www.hostmatters.com
Initially published by Annette:
Heck no - we are usually on a single wavelength on things.
Absolutely. It had been a primary reason I leaned towards not.

Around I like intelligent discourse (and humorous banter), I abhor mindless prattle and tune a lot of it. However, one cannot escape it entirely. Idiots abound and they're legion.

The amount of individuals who speak without thinking and with no make an effort to gain understanding will invariably outnumber individuals that do not.
Alas, very true. Many people much like to listen to themselves talk (and also the Internet counterparts on paper).

  • 1