I am just curious, but I have seen a constantly growing quantity of hosts switching from Limitless Bandwdith to Unmetered Bandwidth, after which within their AUP it states, whenever you achieve 5 GB (or regardless of the amount is) only then do we charge.

Maybe I am wrong, but is not Unmetered and Limitless virtually exactly the same factor? I am talking about, in case your not monitoring it how are you aware just how much they're using?

------------------
Mike Astin
WebAuthorities
http://www.webauthorities.com
http://www.resellerinfo.com - A totally free merchant website (not far off!)

[This message continues to be edited by MikeA (edited 08-18-2000).]
Well, they are saying that it's unmetered *until* you achieve your limit. I do not kow what to say of that. As long as they have the particular limits published, also it is not usd within the identical way as limitless (hidden deep inside the site or TOS).

On another similar subject... how can you state that you are offering (let us use POP boxes for instance), POP boxes the user can setup themself. This is not coming ot right...

Ummm, essentially, you will find occasions whenever you don't monitor the quantity of something (like a host), like POP boxes or e-mail lists. I still prefer to see hard limits set (like 200 POP accounts), rather than the term unmetered, etc...

The things they really mean in these instances is, that it's unmetered Unless of course it might be an issue. This may be taken exactly the same way though. Let's say your user decides to provide hotmail II ??? You need to set limits, because you will find limits (basically).

Uhhhhhh, I ought to stop now. Unsure I even got *any* points across, blah.
There's a substantial distinction between limitless and unmetered. Everyone knows limitless is really a lie. Unmetered enables them the versatility to become generous with bandwidth without setting hard, defined limits. I'm able to think about the key reason why they may do that.

For just one, it appreciates the connection between bandwidth and cpu usage. A website with mostly static HTML pages, which isn't taxing towards the cpu along with other assets, might be alloted more bandwidth than the usual site with dynamically produced pages and well known resource hogs (like UBB).

Unmetered, when i interpret its use, means around you can utilize, within reason, up to and including flexible limit that is dependent in your content and usage.

It's very not the same as limitless.
I still can't stand the terms unmetered or limitless.

I've had attorney at law having a webhost looking to get for auction on my website - but really wants to list his company as getting limitless bandwidth.

I don't list packages claiming to possess limitless bandwidth, as I'd rather not mislead the customers of my website into convinced that it is true.

Anyway - following a couple of emails, he wound up stating that customers get began once they achieve x ammount of CPU processes.

He believed that if there is a website on his servers using 500GB of static HTML transfered per month without getting past that ammount of processes, then it might be of no expense towards the client (on the $19.95 per month account).

This just shows how misleading it's - there's always limits with one of these companies, so don't decide on a host that states offer unmetered or limitless bandwidth.

------------------
Webhost Area Forums!
Unmetered is definitely an imprecise term. It eliminates the actual question - what's the limit? Further, it provides the host a leeway to interpret the word in the manner it likes, should a dispute arise.

It's a term that clients and honest hosts should avoid.

[This message continues to be edited by Chestnut (edited 08-19-2000).]
Michael_Bray,

You do not like "Unlimited or unmetered" then why you've adversitments that shows "unlimited" button somewhere? That's misleading I don't like.

I don't follow Limitless or Unmetered, period.
Initially published by Chestnut:
Unmetered is definitely an imprecise term. It eliminates the actual question - what's the limit? Further, it provides the host a leeway to interpret the word in the manner it likes, should a dispute arises.

It's a term that clients and honest hosts should avoid.
I disagree. Read things i stated above concerning the relationship of bandwidth and cpu usage. Yes it's imprecise, and there's reasonable why it's.

How will you define a restriction that may be completely different for every user due to their content and programs?

I would not eliminate a number that claims unmetered bandwidth (plus some other assets) exclusively on that basis. It is definitely an attempt by some apparently trustworthy hosts to explain, in as short a phrase as you possibly can, a relatively generous quantity of assets. Otherwise, they might just claim limitless and catch the brand new seafood who might accept is as true.

However, if it's really a trick by some companies who began to avoid "unlimited" because an growing quantity of prospective clients began to cure it, then that's another story. Such companies will often produce other tell tale signs than using the term unmetered.

The way in which Duster described it, I truly can't stand the word. Actually his sights (pretty good actually, just *his*) cause me to feel sway completely against while using terms "unlimited" or "unmetered" unconditionally.

If you want to describe a generous quantity of features, I'd advise a hard limit by having an *If you want more, just request!

This way, you may be liberal and hang another 100 POP accounts when needed, etc. If there's an issue, it may be talked about in those days.

"Support, can one get 100 additional POP accounts?"

"Bob, you have 1,000 POP accounts. Are you currently attempting to launch HOTMAIL II ?"

"Is that ok?"

You get the drift.
Chicken,

That's funny individuals. Basically had 1,000 Jumps, I'd run HotMailSucks.com

Kidding ...

But, I do not visit a website itself use 1000 Jumps even. I understand Hotmail does however i mean personal site?

Anyone did, publish it here ...
People appear to obtain ideas within their heads sometimes. I recall reading through a publish that somebody requested, "Does anybody know where Geocities is located?" They desired to launch exactly the same factor.

I figure Geocities should be located on a single of individuals $9.95/mo limitless space/bandwidth hosts. Surely they're wise enough to determine a good deal like this and never pay 1000's of $$$'s
..."UNMETERED" is simply another word to be sneaky, it's within the gray section of words nothing pretty much. For it word by word "unmetered" means unmetered and when you achieve 5GB or 10GB it's still "unmetered" and also the service ought to be provided as introduced. I'd steer clear ANY provider who place the word "unmetered" online then in terms and conditions "til you achieve 5GB" or "a fee is going to be billed when you achieve 5GB". An advertising and marketing trick that increasingly more appear to consider after.

To be sure with Chestnut saying:
### Unmetered is definitely an imprecise term. It eliminates the actual question - what's the limit? Further, it provides the host a leeway to interpret the word in the manner it likes, should a dispute arises.###

It's exactly what it's.
If it's unmetered, then how can they are fully aware just how much you use? And when they understand the stats, they ARE METERING it.

Unmetered way to "not keep an eye on"...and when you browse the sites that say "unmetered", they have a tough number within the TOS, so Dusty is wrong in stating that they are doing that so that they don't have to set hard amounts....show us a site that states "unmetered" and it has no defined limit within their TOS?!


And when they'd no defined limit, within their terms, thats a whole lot worse! Which means you're departing all of them with the only discretion, they are able to screw you anythime they want.
I can tell Duster's perspective, but To be sure with Chicken. Get rid of the "Unmetered" and say "If you would like more, request". In my experience Unmetered is a method to circumvent the limitless problem.

Duster, To be sure it's a good policy, however i believe that if your site lists a restriction, then it is not unmetered. Based on the dictionary metered way to measure, therefore unmetered means not measured. Well when not measured, it's limitless, right?

------------------
Mike Astin
WebAuthorities
http://www.webauthorities.com
http://www.resellerinfo.com - A totally free merchant website (not far off!)
I wasn't protecting using the word, just mentioning that it ought to be drawn in context along with other factors on the website.

It is simple to judge through just one word, but who here hasn't designed a mistake or stated the incorrect factor not understanding why? I have seen lots of people here make use of the word "spam" wrongly. Does which means that you cannot trust what they have to say?

Yes, it is best to possess defined limits. It gives people something to pay attention to. I personally use terms like "as almost as much ast you are prone to need", "within reason", "as much as you would like, within reason" and "just request if you want more".

Bear in mind that we view hosts (that participate here) change their terminology to more precisely reflect their choices. Their attitude and repair is equivalent to once they stated "unlimited", so what's transformed apart from their terminology?

There's no ambiguity within the concept of "unlimited" and the majority of us are rather unforgiving associated with a company that utilizes the word. It's clearly, and unquestionably, misprepresentation. Not too with unmetered.

A number of yu aren't permitting for that possiblity of the company offering good service that has not learned to become more specific in explaining that service. So many people search for short, frequently a word, terms. Unmetered is unquestionably shorter than "as much as you would like within reason. Just request if you want more" or explaining the connection between bandwidth and cpu usage around the service plans page.

Remember, many website hosts, including many here, are only a number of people. When they do not have, or take, time to seize a dictionary and make certain they will use the best term, which may be the only factor wrong using their site and repair, should that alone disqualify them?

Can there be anybody here who has not used an incorrect word within the this past year? The number of individuals make use of a dictionary regularly if you are unsure from the concept of a thing? Even trustworthy dictionaries (I personally use Webster's Unabridged) don't precisely describe several things-. The number of individuals take the time to appear in other reference texts to be certain?

The intent of the webhost to explain their services, together with their history, are essential. If they're under perfect (and which of them aren't) and aren't trying to trick, i quickly think some leeway ought to be so as and it ought to be drawn in context.

*example: many dictionaries don't precisely describe the main difference from a midget along with a dwarf, although it is possible to do.

  • 1