It is a good question, though most likely less impoortant as you may think. It's the sites that consume a lot more than the alloted share of assets that routinely have the issue. They may be shut lower without warning becasue from it.

Some hosts will move such accounts to servers where you will find less other large usage accounts to allow them to remain "good neighbors".

My last host did that for my account soon after I gone to live in them. I'd said excitedly that my forums were very popular even though, I'm more vulnerable to understatement than exaggeration, they rapidly discovered which i wasn't fueling. They moved my account and that i observed there have been far less accounts discussing exactly the same server (they'd incorrectly given me full use of the rest of the account around the server, including read permissions, so I saw all of the others. There have been much less following the move.

You've more essential concerns to cope with than that one. I think you will find so that it is of little consequence (unless of course your internet site is certainly one of htsoe resource hogs).
I am performing my first look for a hosting company, and I am finding a great deal of issues to examine! I am performing this look for a non-profit organization that is creating a quite simple site and who's willing to cover virtual shared server service, so they won't 'cheapen' it's message by surrounding it with ads. If I am reading through things properly it may sound like once you have recognized your narrow your search of suppliers that meet your needs and also have sifted through individuals reviews and opinions of individuals suppliers, you are quit using the 'lottery' when it comes to who you'd be discussing a server with. When we get put on a server with a couple of 'hogs', then my service will get slow and my clients get frustrated and then leave.

So my real question is, what's reasonable to request a possible host about who I'd be discussing a server with, and what's reasonable to demand for the reason that regard?

Thanks, Jazzie
To be sure with Duster...and you will most likely result in the assessment yourself . Generally the discount basement hosts will set more sites on a single server leading to yours to decelerate. To not offend anybody here (I stated generally!) but when you have to pay $5.95 for any site, you most likely should expect delays. Pay $10 or even more for somebody not offering limitless everything and you ought to be ok.
Browse the Tos (TOS), if you discover a piece restricting CPU cycles or CPU seconds, you need to feel well informed your website will not suffer because that host is monitoring for hogs. If you do not view it odds on someone will abuse the server.

------------------
Chris Marks
KBS Website Hosting http://www.netfronts.com

[This message continues to be edited by marksy (edited 07-01-2000).]
Thanks, both Duster and Marksy! There certainly is to decipher here!

To be sure that's vital that you understand that you will get that which you purchase, Marksy.

So can one summarize your two comments by stating that, in identifying whether a possible host is a great one, I ought to verify they have a piece within their TOS restricting CPU cycles/seconds, after which I'm able to expect that they'll supply the necessary defense against the hogs?

[This message continues to be edited by Jazzie (edited 07-01-2000).]

[This message continues to be edited by Jazzie (edited 07-01-2000).]
Lots of good hosts have terrible TOS (for the reason that they aren't accurate representations of the organization).

A much better indicator could be to not search for hosts with too cheap an agenda A number offering service for $5 will attract lots of cheap accounts and can most likely crowd much more on the server to pay for that lower return (than hosts offering $20 plans). I have read of as much as 500 accounts on the server, much more.

I've guides for selecting a number put together from what I have learned, including from forums like that one. You can observe it around the right side menu at http://techcellence.net Among the points I make is particularly apropo here, "Sometimes cheap is simply too cheap".

Despite the fact that you are around the opposite sid eof the resource hog problem, I'd search for a number that discloes restrictions of bandwidth and cpu usage. The odds are better that any host that's honest and fair to high usage accounts will treat its clients fairly.
Hi!

I'm who owns ForgetMonthlyFees.com and what we should do is we move our large accounts to some server that may suite them. If their account get way beyond control, only then do we insist upon them getting their very own devoted server.

------------------
Regards,
Jay Betancourt
http://www.ForgetMonthlyFees.com
Never purchase website hosting again!
  • 1